Comparison of human and monkey retinal photoreceptor sampling mosaics
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Maximum Academic Press in Visual Neuroscience
- Vol. 3 (3) , 281-285
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523800010038
Abstract
We test the hypothesis that the diameters of foveal and near-foveal rods and cones for one well-studied human photoreceptor mosaic and one well-studied monkey photoreceptor mosaic (Macaca fascicularis) a scaled relative to focal length. We conclude that this hypothesis is not supported. Rather than being scali proportionally, the sizes of the rods and cones, respectively, are nearly equivalent for both the human ar monkey resulting in an effectively finer retinal grain for the larger human eye. Furthermore, the human density exceeds the monkey rod density beyond about 1 deg of retinal eccentricity. These results suggest variation across primate species is reflected in retinal sampling strategies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eyeVision Research, 1988
- Does cone positional disorder limit resolution?Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1987
- Distribution of Cones in Human and Monkey Retina: Individual Variability and Radial AsymmetryScience, 1987
- A whole mount method for sequential analysis of photoreceptor and ganglion cell topography in a single retinaVision Research, 1986
- Sampling-theory analysis of spatial visionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986
- Quality of the primate photoreceptor lattice and limits of spatial visionVision Research, 1984
- Behavioral studies on the effect of abnormal early visual experience in monkeys: Spatial modulation sensitivityVision Research, 1982
- Spectral analysis of spatial sampling by photoreceptors: Topological disorder prevents aliasingVision Research, 1982
- Image degradation by an irregular retinal mosaicBiological Cybernetics, 1977
- Striate cortex lesions and visual acuity of the rhesus monkey.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963