Prediction of Indications for Valve Replacement Among Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation and Normal Left Ventricular Performance
- 17 February 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 97 (6) , 525-534
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.6.525
Abstract
Background—Optimal criteria for valve replacement are unclear in asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and normal left ventricular (LV) performance at rest. Moreover, previous studies have not assessed the prognostic capacity of load-adjusted LV performance (“contractility”) variables, which may be fundamentally related to clinical state. Therefore, 18 years ago, we set out to test prospectively the hypothesis that objective noninvasive measures of LV size and performance and, specifically, of load-adjusted variables, assessed at rest and during exercise (ex), could predict the development of currently accepted indications for operation for AR. Methods and Results—Clinical variables and measures of LV size, performance, and end-systolic wall stress (ESS) were assessed annually in 104 patients by radionuclide cineangiography at rest and maximal ex and by echocardiography at rest; ESS was derived during ex. During an average 7.3-year follow-up among patients who had not been operated on, 39 of 104 patients either died suddenly (n=4) or developed operable symptoms only (n=22) or subnormal LV performance with or without symptoms (n=13) (progression rate=6.2%/y). By multivariate Cox model analysis, change (Δ) in LV ejection fraction (EF) from rest to ex, normalized for ΔESS from rest to ex (ΔLVEF-ΔESS index), was the strongest predictor of progression to any end point or to sudden cardiac death alone. Unadjusted ΔLVEF was almost as efficient. Symptom status modified prediction on the basis of the ΔLVEF-ΔESS index. The population tercile at highest risk by ΔLVEF-ΔESS progressed to end points at a rate of 13.3%/y, and the lowest-risk tercile progressed at 1.8%/y. Conclusions—Currently accepted symptom and LV performance indications for valve replacement, as well as sudden cardiac death, can be predicted in asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patients with AR by load-adjusted ΔLVEF-ΔESS index, which includes data obtained during exercise.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival and functional results after valve replacement for aortic regurgitation from 1976 to 1983: impact of preoperative left ventricular function.Circulation, 1985
- Chronic aortic regurgitation: reassessment of the prognostic value of preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension and fractional shortening.Circulation, 1985
- Reversal of left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation: influence of duration of preoperative left ventricular dysfunction.Circulation, 1984
- The natural history of asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function.Circulation, 1983
- Noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress: validation of the method and initial application.Circulation, 1982
- Preoperative exercise capacity in symptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation as a predictor of postoperative left ventricular function and long-term prognosis.Circulation, 1980
- Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. II. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients.Circulation, 1980
- Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. I. Evaluation of the results of aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients.Circulation, 1980
- Real-Time Radionuclide Cineangiography in the Noninvasive Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function at Rest and during Exercise in Patients with Coronary-Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958