Continuing Medical Education
- 25 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 249 (8) , 1042-1045
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1983.03330320040029
Abstract
Traditional continuing medical education (CME) keeps physicians aware of the state of the art. It has limitations, however, as a qualityassurance tool: it is memory based, involves a group endeavor with diffuse goals, often unrelated to practice, is an inappropriate remedy for many problems in patient care, is hampered by poor-quality evaluation, and is governed more by market factors than educational outcomes. The self-study of practice and practice-linked CME offer rich potential for development. The physician's monitoring of his work, with appropriate improvements in performance, is valuable CME. Computers provide facts and guidance at the time and place the physician is developing diagnostic plans, diminishing reliance on memory. The next step in CME is for hospitals, societies, and medical schools to perfect methods of self-study of practice and practice-linked CME. (JAMA1983;249:1042-1045)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postgraduate education and the doctor.BMJ, 1980
- The Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education: A Literature ReviewHealth Education Monographs, 1977
- Protocol-Based Computer Reminders, the Quality of Care and the Non-Perfectability of ManNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Use of a Computer to Detect and Respond to Clinical Events: Its Effect on Clinician BehaviorAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1976
- Mandatory continuing education. Sense or nonsense?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1970
- Continuing education and patient care research. Physician response to screening test resultsJAMA, 1967
- The Lengthened LinePerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1967