Who Gets Second Opinions?
Open Access
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 18 (5) , 137-145
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.137
Abstract
Six states require health plans to provide or authorize second medical opinions (SMOs). The intent of such legislation is to preserve consumer choice, to improve the flow of information, and to improve health outcomes in this era of managed care. However, it is unclear who benefits from these laws. This paper reviews the changing role of second opinions and, using a nationally representative data set from the Commonwealth Fund, examines who gets them. Of persons who had visited a doctor in the previous year, 19 percent received a second opinion, for an estimated cost of $3.2 billion in 1994. Findings suggest that cultural norms and sociocultural factors may partially determine who may benefit from SMO legislation.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managed Care RegulationJAMA, 1997
- Physician-Patient CommunicationThe Relationship With Malpractice Claims Among Primary Care Physicians and SurgeonsJAMA, 1997
- Medical Ethics in the Era of Managed Care: The Need for Institutional Structures Instead of Principles for Individual CasesThe Journal of Clinical Ethics, 1995
- Effect of Utilization Review in a Fee-for-Service Health Insurance PlanNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Cost and Value of Second Surgical Opinion Programs: A Critical Review of the LiteratureJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1990