Cultured human skin fibroblasts: a model for the study of androgen action
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
- Vol. 36 (1) , 3-22
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02354827
Abstract
Human skin may be considered as a target organ for androgens, as are male sex accessory organs, since all events involved in testosterone action have been observed in this tissue. As a corollary, the mechanism of androgen action can be studiedin vitro in cultured skin fibroblasts. The advantages of this system are that studies can be performed with intact human cells under carefully controlled conditions, differentiated genetic and biochemical characteristics of the cells are faithfully preserved and the biological material is renewable from a single biopsy specimen. The metabolism of androgens, in particular the 5α-reduction of testosterone to the active metabolite, dihydrotestosterone, the intracellular binding of androgen to its specific receptor protein and its subsequent translocation to the nucleus have been studied in skin fibroblasts. The intracellular androgen receptor content of genital skin fibroblasts is higher than that from nongenital skin sites. In addition, the androgen receptor has been characterized as a specific macromolecule with properties of high affinity and low capacity similar to that of other steroid hormone receptors. The pathophysiology of three genetic mutations which alter normal male sexual development and differentiation has been identified in the human skin fibroblast system. In 5α-reductase deficiency, an autosomal recessive disorder in which dihydrotestosterone formation is impaired, virilization of the Wolffian ducts is normal but the external genitalia and urogenital sinus derivatives are female in character. At least two types of X-linked disorders of the androgen receptor exist such that the actions of both testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are impaired and developmental abnormalities may involve both Wolffian derivatives and the external genitalia as well. These two forms of androgen insensitivity result from either the absence of androgen receptor binding activity (receptor(−)form) or apparently normal androgen receptor binding with absence of an appropriate biological response (receptor (+) form). In addition, studies with human skin fibroblasts may also be of value in defining the cellular mechanisms underlying the broad spectrum of partial defects in virilization. In summary, we have correlated our studies of the molecular mechanism of androgen action in human genital skin fibroblasts with those of other investigators as these studies contribute to our understanding of male sexual development and differentiation.This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Syndromes of Androgen ResistanceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Role of testosterone binding to the androgen receptor in male sexual differentiation of patients with 5α-reductase deficiencyThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1979
- Androgens and the Evolution of Male-Gender Identity among Male Pseudohermaphrodites with 5α-Reductase DeficiencyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- 5α-Reductase activity of genital and nongenital skin fibroblasts from patients with 5α-reductase deficiency, androgen insensitivity, or unknown forms of male pseudohermaphroditismAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1978
- Partial Androgen InsensitivityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Male pseudohermaphroditism presumably due to target organ unresponsiveness to androgens. Deficient 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone binding in cultured skin fibroblasts.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1976
- A New Method for the Characterization of the Androgen Receptors by use of a Steroid AntibodyEndocrine Research Communications, 1974
- Pseudohermaphrodite Rat: End Organ Insensitivity to TestosteroneScience, 1970
- The In Vitro Metabolism of Testosterone by Human Skin1Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1956
- THE ATTRACTIONS OF PROTEINS FOR SMALL MOLECULES AND IONSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1949