Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 2: return to Elsinore.
Open Access
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 10-13
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.16.1.10
Abstract
No discussion of when an individual is dead is meaningful in the absence of a definition of death. If human death is defined as the irreversible loss of the capacity for consciousness combined with the irreversible loss of the capacity to breathe spontaneously (and hence to maintain a spontaneous heart beat) the death of the brainstem will be seen to be the necessary and sufficient condition for the death of the individual. Such a definition of death is not something radically new. It is merely the reformulation -- in the language of the neurophysiologist -- of much older concepts such as the 'departure of the (conscious) soul from the body' and the 'loss of the breath of life'. All death -- in this perspective -- is, and always has been, brainstem death....Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Appropriate Confusion Over `Brain Death'JAMA, 1989
- Anencephaly: Selected Medical AspectsHastings Center Report, 1988
- Prolonged Hemodynamic Maintenance by the Combined Administration of Vasopressin and Epinephrine in Brain Death: A Clinical StudyNeurosurgery, 1986
- Natural history of global and critical brain ischaemia Part III: cerebral prognostic signs after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cerebral recovery course and rate during the first year after global and critical ischaemia monitored and predicted by EEG and neurological signsResuscitation, 1981
- Brain death: retrospective surveys.1981
- Brain death: Welcome definition--or dangerous judgement?1972