The Effects of Mandatory Prescribing of Thiazides for Newly Treated, Uncomplicated Hypertension: Interrupted Time-Series Analysis
Open Access
- 10 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 4 (7) , e232
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040232
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of a new reimbursement rule for antihypertensive medication that made thiazides mandatory first-line drugs for newly treated, uncomplicated hypertension. The objective of the new regulation was to reduce drug expenditures. We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis on prescribing data before and after the new reimbursement rule for antihypertensive medication was put into effect. All patients started on antihypertensive medication in 61 general practices in Norway were included in the analysis. The new rule was put forward by the Ministry of Health and was approved by parliament. Adherence to the rule was monitored only minimally, and there were no penalties for non-adherence. Our primary outcome was the proportion of thiazide prescriptions among all prescriptions made for persons started on antihypertensive medication. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who, within 4 mo, reached recommended blood-pressure goals and the proportion of patients who, within 4 mo, were not started on a second antihypertensive drug. We also compared drug costs before and after the intervention. During the baseline period, 10% of patients started on antihypertensive medication were given a thiazide prescription. This proportion rose steadily during the transition period, after which it remained stable at 25%. For other outcomes, no statistically significant differences were demonstrated. Achievement of treatment goals was slightly higher (56.6% versus 58.4%) after the new rule was introduced, and the prescribing of a second drug was slightly lower (24.0% versus 21.8%). Drug costs were reduced by an estimated Norwegian kroner 4.8 million (€0.58 million, US$0.72 million) in the first year, which is equivalent to Norwegian kroner 1.06 per inhabitant (€0.13, US$0.16). Prescribing of thiazides in Norway for uncomplicated hypertension more than doubled after a reimbursement rule requiring the use of thiazides as the first-choice therapy was put into effect. However, the resulting savings on drug expenditures were modest. There were no significant changes in the achievement of treatment goals or in the prescribing of a second antihypertensive drug.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rational Prescribing in Primary Care (RaPP): Economic Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Professional PracticePLoS Medicine, 2006
- Rational Prescribing in Primary Care (RaPP): A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Tailored InterventionPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policiesPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Doctors urged to present views in an objective way to the mediaBMJ, 2005
- INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES DESIGNS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: LESSONS FROM TWO SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE STRATEGIESInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2003
- The potential savings of using thiazides as the first choice antihypertensive drug: cost-minimisation analysisBMC Health Services Research, 2003
- Effects of restrictive formularies in the ambulatory care setting.2002
- Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift?Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2000
- Physicians and the Pharmaceutical IndustryJAMA, 2000