Detection of prostate cancer in males with prostatism
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Prostate
- Vol. 25 (3) , 132-140
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990250304
Abstract
The present study was designed to compare the prostate cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) in a consecutive cohort of males presenting to a single institution with clinically significant prostatism. The study population was comprised of 224 consecutive males with clinically significant prostatism referred to the Prostate Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin between June 1990 and December 1991. Subjects were considered to have clinically significant prostatism if they elected to pursue medical or surgical therapy following exclusion of carcinoma of the prostate. The initial examination consisted of a Boyarsky symptom score assessment, DRE, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual determination, serum PSA level, and transrectal prostatic ultrasonography. Subjects with an abnormality on DRE or serum PSA > 4 ng/dl were advised to undergo transrectal prostatic biopsy. Of the 224 subjects, 40 (17.9%) had an abnormal DRE and 57 (25.4%) had an elevated serum PSA > 4 ng/dl. The overall detection rate of prostate cancer in the study population was 6.7%. The prostate cancer detection rates for PSA alone and DRE alone were 5.8% and 5.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of PSA alone were 86.7%, 80.9%, and 25.0% and of DRE alone 80.0%, 86.3%, and 30.0%, respectively. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the entire study population in order to compare the screening measures serum PSA and PSA density. The area under the curves was 0.88 for both tests, indicating that these screening tests for prostate cancer were not significantly different. The present study demonstrated that males with clinically significant prostatism represent a high risk cohort for detecting prostate cancer. DRE and PSA are equally effective measures for detecting prostate cancer. PSA density does not offer any advantage over serum PSA in screening for prostate cancer, except in the subset of patients with a normal DRE and serum PSA levels between 4.0 and 9.9 ng/dl.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Economics of Screening for Carcinoma of the ProstateUrologic Clinics of North America, 1990
- Evaluation of Treatment Response to Drugs in Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaUrologic Clinics of North America, 1990
- Sonographic and Pathological Staging of Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1989
- Assessment of Screening for Prostate Cancer Using the Digital Rectal ExaminationJournal of Urology, 1989
- Prostate Specific Antigen in the Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation of Localized Prostatic Cancer Treated with Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1988
- Radical Prostatectomy for Carcinoma in Men More Than 69 Years OldJournal of Urology, 1987
- Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982