Measuring Impacts of Some Common Energy Conservation Programs Under Conditions of Nonrandom Assignment
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 11 (2) , 242-253
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8701100206
Abstract
Nonrandom assignment to program and control group conditions can create serious difficulties for the evaluation of impacts of energy conservation programs. The particular analytic strategy that is appropriate depends on the character of the causal mechanisms associated with the nonrandom assignment. Guidlines for selection of the appropriate analytic techniques are presented and the analytical techniques described. It is recom mended that the possibility of performing a true experiment should be explored, beyond the use of random assignment to wait list and program conditions, in order to avoid the analytic complexities necessary in the nonrandom assignment designs.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Analysis of Various Types of Home Energy AuditsEvaluation Review, 1986
- Energy Conservation Research of California's UtilitiesEvaluation Review, 1984
- The role of financial incentives in utility-sponsored residential conservation programs: A review of customer surveysEvaluation and Program Planning, 1984
- Residential Conservation Program ImpactsEvaluation Review, 1983
- DETECTION OF CORRELATED ERRORS IN LONGITUDINAL DATABritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1975
- A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Estimation of the Slope and Analysis of Covariance When the Concomitant Variable is Measured with ErrorJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1972
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969
- Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960