Evaluation of Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using a Nonsense-Syllable Test II. Syllable Recognition and Consonant Confusion Patterns
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 25 (1) , 141-148
- https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2501.141
Abstract
Syllable recognition ability and consonant confusion patterns were evaluated for 38 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss using the closed-set Nonsense-Syllable Test (NST). Performance for these materials varies as a function of consonant voicing, the position of the consonant in the syllable, and the accompanying vowel. Scores for listeners with steeply sloping audiometric configurations were consistently poorer than those for listeners with gradually sloping or flat audiograms. Consonant confusion analyses revealed place of articulation errors to be the most frequent, regardless of the listener's audiometric configuration. Analysis of consonant confusion patterns indicates the existence of a systematic relationship between consonant confusions and audiometric configuration. The NST findings are discussed in terms of the test's potential use and are compared to the results of existing confusion analyses.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using a Nonsense-Syllable Test I. Test ReliabilityJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1982
- Three Experiments on the California Consonant TestJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1979
- A Comparison of the Effects of Filtering and Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Patterns of Consonant ConfusionsJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978
- Development of the California Consonant TestJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1977
- Consonant Confusions in Patients with Sensorineural Hearing LossJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976