Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer
- 1 February 2003
- Vol. 61 (2) , 386-390
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02255-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research GroupBJU International, 2001
- RE: RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 1999
- RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: THE PERINEAL APPROACH INCREASES THE RISK OF SURGICALLY INDUCED POSITIVE MARGINS AND CAPSULAR INCISIONSJournal of Urology, 1998
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- Patterns of Positive Specimen Margins and Detectable Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical Perineal ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1995
- Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1994
- Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1992
- Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerationsThe Prostate, 1983