Competing Matchmaking
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the European Economic Association
- Vol. 6 (4) , 789-818
- https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2008.6.4.789
Abstract
We study how matchmakers use prices to sort heterogeneous participants into competing matching markets and how equilibrium out comes compare with monopoly in terms of prices, matching market structure, and sorting efficiency under the assumption of comple- mentarity in the match value function. The role of prices to facilitate sorting is compro- mised by the need to survive price competition. We show that price competition leads to a high-quality market that is insufficiently ex clusive. As a result, the duopolistic outcome can be less efficient in sorting than the monopoly outcome in terms of total match value in spite of servicing more participants. (JEL: C7, D4)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competition in two-sided marketsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2006
- Price discrimination and efficient matchingEconomic Theory, 2006
- Unravelling of Dynamic SortingThe Review of Economic Studies, 2005
- Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service ProvidersThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2003
- Competing cybermediariesEuropean Economic Review, 2001
- Logconcavity versus Logconvexity: A Complete CharacterizationJournal of Economic Theory, 1998
- Valuation Equilibrium with ClubsJournal of Economic Theory, 1997
- Marriage and ClassThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- Equilibrium and Inefficiency in a Community Model With Peer Group EffectsJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Equilibrium Selection in Signaling GamesEconometrica, 1987