Sexual division of labor: Energetic and evolutionary scenarios
- 21 August 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Human Biology
- Vol. 14 (5) , 627-640
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.10074
Abstract
This article examines comparative energetic data on hunter–gatherers in the context of evolutionary scenarios of the sexual division of labor, with respect to both specific task allocation and overall levels of daily physical activity. The division of labor between men and women, well marked in contemporary foraging societies, was once posited as the “true watershed” for the evolution of the genus Homo. Some research on brain‐wiring even links sex differences in cognitive and spatial abilities to sex‐specific foraging activities. Most recent evolutionary arguments posit that men focus on hunting and women on gathering activities to realize potentially conflicting mating and parenting goals. A range of cooperative strategies (male/female and female/female) for child provisioning is also under investigation. Attention to energetic and reproductive trade‐offs has usefully challenged the proposition that women are excluded from big‐game hunting due to constraints of foraging ecology and reproduction. Simplistic assumptions about gender roles are thus increasingly questioned in anthropology, as well as in archaeology. Current models in behavioral ecology explore ways in which foraging practices vary with ecological circumstances, aiming to derive testable hypotheses from fine‐grained data on the behavior of contemporary hunter–gatherers. Data on overall physical activity levels (PAL) can also serve to evaluate relative male/female workloads in modern groups, reconstruct hominid energy requirements and activity profiles, and examine changes with subsistence intensification. Male/female PAL ratios show that a task‐specific division of labor does not readily extrapolate to 24‐hour energy expenditure and that male/female differences in workloads were not necessarily reduced with the transition to agriculture. With respect to gender roles and PAL, a shift away from facile stereotypes of human behavior is evident. The challenge is to incorporate a range of behavioral responses to ecological circumstances in reconstructions of our evolutionary past. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14:627–640, 2002.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfindingEvolution and Human Behavior, 2000
- Differences in Parental Investment Contribute to Important Differences Between Men and WomenCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1999
- Grandmothering and the evolution ofHomo erectusJournal of Human Evolution, 1999
- Work and hormonal variation in subsistence and industrial contextsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- Sexual selection, the division of labor, and the evolution of sex differencesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998
- Origin of metazoan phyla: Cambrian explosion or proterozoic slow burn?Published by Elsevier ,1997
- The Sexual Division of Foraging Labor: Biology, Taboo, and Gender PoliticsComparative Studies in Society and History, 1996
- Compendium of Physical Activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- Women as hunters among the matses of the Peruvian AmazonHuman Ecology, 1983
- Entailment Theory and Method: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Sexual Division of LaborBehavior Science Research, 1977