Congruence between phylogenetic and stratigraphic data on the history of life
- 22 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 264 (1383) , 885-890
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0123
Abstract
The quality of the fossil record and the accuracy of reconstructed phylogenies have been debated recently, and doubt has been cast on how far current knowledge actually reflects what happened in the past. A survey of 384 published cladograms of a variety of animals (echinoderms, fishes, tetrapods) shows that there is good agreement between phylogenetic (character) data and stratigraphic (age) data, based on a variety of comparative metrics. This congruence of conclusions from two essentially independent sources of data confirms that the majority of cladograms are broadly accurate and that the fossil record, incomplete as it is, gives a reasonably faithful documentation of the sequence of occurrence of organisms through time.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stratigraphic Indices and Tree BalanceSystematic Biology, 1997
- Testing the quality of the fossil record by groups and by major habitatsHistorical Biology, 1996
- Testing the time axis of phylogeniesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1995
- Testing the marine and continental fossil recordsGeology, 1995
- Comparing the stratigraphic record to estimates of phylogenyPaleobiology, 1994
- CONGRUENCE BETWEEN SUPERPOSITIONAL AND PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS: COMPARING CLADISTIC PATTERNS WITH FOSSIL RECORDSCladistics, 1992
- The Fossil Record and Evolution: Comparing Cladistic and Paleontologic Evidence for Vertebrate HistoryScience, 1992
- AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILSCladistics, 1988
- Taxonomic Diversity during the PhanerozoicScience, 1972
- ORIGIN AND DIVERSIFICATION OF TELEOSTEAN FISHESAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1969