Proposed Agenda for the Measurement of Quality-of-Care Outcomes in Oncology Practice
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 17 (8) , 2614
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2614
Abstract
Cancer is an important disease, and health care services have the potential to improve the quality and quantity of life for cancer patients. The delivery of these services also has recently been well codified. Given this framework, cancer care presents a unique opportunity for clinicians to develop and test outcome measures across diverse practice settings. Recently, the Institute of Medicine released a report reviewing the quality of cancer care in the United States and called for further development and monitoring of quality indicators. Thus, as we move into the 21st century, professional and regulatory agencies will be seeking to expand process measures and develop and validate outcomes-oriented measures for cancer and other diseases. For such measures to be clinically relevant and feasible, it is key that the oncology community take an active leadership role in this process. To set the stage for such activities, this article first reviews broad methodologic concerns involved in selecting measures of the quality of care, using breast cancer to exemplify key issues. We then use the case of breast cancer to review the different phases of cancer care and provide examples of phase-specific measures that, after careful operationalization, testing, and validation, could be used as the basis of an agenda for measuring the quality of breast cancer care in oncology practice. The diffusion of process and outcome measures into practice; the practicality, reliability, and validity of these measures; and the impact that these indicators have on practice patterns and the health of populations will be key to evaluating the success of such quality-of-care paradigms. Ultimately, improved quality of care should translate into morbidity and mortality reductions.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer — A Multicenter Validation StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Quality of Care — What is It?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Patients' psychological and cosmetic experience after immediatebreast reconstructionEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1996
- Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammographyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- The surgical management of primary invasive breast cancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1995
- CE Credit: How to Use the New AHCPR Cancer Pain GuidelinesThe American Journal of Nursing, 1994
- Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Development of a Brief Screening Instrument for Detecting Depressive DisordersMedical Care, 1988
- Geographically-based cancer control: Methods for targeting and evaluating the impact of screening interventions on defined populationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1987
- Quality Assurance in MedicineAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1984