Predictive value of pelvic scores for induction of labor by local PGE2
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 47 (1) , 17-23
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(92)90209-h
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: intracervical gel or vaginal pessaries?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1991
- Induction of labour: The effect of vaginal prostaglandin or i.v. oxytocin — a matter of time only?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1990
- Lamicel® does not promote induction of labour. A randomized controlled studyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1989
- The efficiency of prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories versus intracervical prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in patients with unfavorable inducibility prospectsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1988
- Prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppository for induction of labour: an efficient, safe and popular methodEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1987
- Cervical CollagenObstetrics & Gynecology, 1986
- An evaluation of the Bishop scoring system in relation to a method of induction of labour by intra-vaginal prostaglandinPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1982
- Determinant role of initial cervical dilatation on the course of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1962
- Primigravid LaborObstetrics & Gynecology, 1955
- On predicting the length of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1941