Abstract
Brief tonal signals presented soon after the onset of a masking noise are known to be less detectable than signals delayed by several hundred milliseconds. This difference in detectability is known as the "overshoot". Signals of two sorts were studied here.sbd.either interaurally in phase (So) or interaurally out of phase by 180.degree. (S.pi.). When So signals of 750 Hz and about 14 mg in duration were presented 4 ms after the onset of a diotic, broadband masking noise (No), detectability was about 6 dB worse than when the signal was presented 325 ms after onset. By contrast, there was no such overshoot when S.pi. signals were presented at varying times after masker onset; detectability was about the same for all values of signal delay. Accordingly, the difference in performance between NoSo and NoS.pi..sbd.the masking-level difference or MLD.sbd.was large (about 16 dB) with the shortest delayes used and diminished (to about 9 dB) as the delay was increased. This absence of overshoot with the S.pi. signals is in accord with the well-established view that detectability in the dichotic masking conditions is based upon different stimulus information from that used in the diotic maksing conditions. specifically, the evidence confirms the common view that detectability in the diotic conditions is based more or less directly on neural firing rate, whereas, in the dichotic conditions, it is based upon internaural time differences encoded in the periodicity of neural findings.

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: