Classification of findings in mammography screening--a method to minimise recall anxiety?
Open Access
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 45 (4) , 321-324
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.45.4.321
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to find out if it is possible, by classifying screening mammograms according to the likelihood of malignancy, to divide the recalled women to a group in which there is high suspicion of malignancy, most having breast cancers, and a group with more obscure findings. DESIGN--Screening mammograms of recalled women were classified according to the likelihood of malignancy. 0 = technically insufficient, 1 = normal, 2 = benign tumour, 3 = malignancy cannot be excluded, 4 = strongly suspicious for malignancy, 5 = malignant. SETTING--This study was a population based survey of mammography screening in Helsinki and surroundings in Finland. PATIENTS--21,417 women (aged 50-59 years) were invited to be screened, 18,012 (84.10%) participated. Of these 579 (3.21% of those screened) were recalled for further studies; 124 of these were referred for surgical biopsy and 82 had breast cancer. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--All cases classified as 5, 60% of the cases classified as 4, 6.5% of the cases classified as 3, 0% of the cases classified as 2 or 1, and 1.2% of the cases classified as 0 proved to have breast cancers. However classification 5 represented 5.9% of all recalled women and 41.5% of all screening detected breast cancers; classification 4, 6.0% of all recalled women and 25.6% of all screening detected breast cancers; classification 3, 68.9% of all recalled women and 31.7% of all screening detected breast cancers; classification 2, 11.7% and classification 1, 2.9% of all recalled women. No breast cancers were detected with these classifications. Classification 0 represented 4.5% of all recalled women and 1.2% of all screening detected breast cancers. Classifications 5 and 4 represented only 11.9% of all recalled women but 67.1% of all screening detected breast cancers. CONCLUSIONS--By classifying screening mammograms according to the likelihood of malignancy, recalled women can be divided into two groups: (1) a quite small subgroup in which everyone or almost everyone will be shown to have breast cancer; and (2) a much larger subgroup in which only a few will be proven to have breast cancer. The invitation procedure for the further studies should be improved on this basis of minimising anxiety among recalled women.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1989
- Psychological costs of screening.BMJ, 1989
- Shadows over screening mammographyClinical Radiology, 1989
- Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial.BMJ, 1988
- Breast cancer risk for women with a false positive screening testBritish Journal of Cancer, 1988
- A licence for breast cancer screening?BMJ, 1988
- A case‐control study of the efficacy of a non‐randomized breast cancer screening program in florence (Italy)International Journal of Cancer, 1986
- Breast cancer screening: a different look at the evidence.1986
- Women who decline breast screening.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1984
- Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial.Radiology, 1981