The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?
Open Access
- 9 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 11-23
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.183
Abstract
This paper addresses the hypothesis derived from self‐categorization theory (SCT) that the relationship between groups and stereotyping will be affected by the social structural conditions within which group interaction occurs. A mixed design experiment (n=56) measured low‐status groups' stereotypes and preferences for conflict with a high‐status outgroup prior to and after within‐group discussion across varying social structural conditions. Over time, participants in [open] conditions consensualized around positive conceptions of the outgroup and endorsed acceptance of their own [low status] position. However, in [closed] conditions participants consensualized around positive conceptions of the ingroup, negative conceptions of the outgroup, and tended towards preferences for collective protest. It is argued that the data support S‐CT's contention that stereotyping and group processes are fundamentally interlinked and that neither can be properly understood in isolation from the dynamics of the surrounding intergroup context. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: how shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social realityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- Stereotypes as justifications for prior intergroup discrimination: Studies of Scottish national stereotypingEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2001
- A 100 years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertaintyBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2001
- Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2000
- When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group-based dynamics of the consensualization processEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1998
- The Group as a Basis for Emergent Stereotype ConsensusEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 1997
- Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social ContextEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 1996
- Self and Collective: Cognition and Social ContextPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994
- The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social changeBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1990
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986