Long‐term stability of clinical attachment following guided tissue regeneration and conventional therapy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
44 patients (34% smokers) presenting with severe periodontitis were treated with full mouth root planing (RPL). In each patient, 1 intrabony defect was treated with guided tissue regeneration (GTR). After 1 year of monthly prophylaxis, full mouth plaque (FMPS) and bleeding (FMBS) scores were 8.3 +/- 4.1% and 5.6 +/- 3.8%. At 1 year, the GTR treated sites were matched, in each patient, with 1 RPL site, in terms of probing attachment level (PAL 6.8 +/- 2.4 mm GTR, and 6.5 +/- 2.3 mm RPL). At this point, 24 patients took part in a supportive periodontal care program. 20 patients did not participate, and received only sporadic care by general dentists. At 5 years, all patients were reexamined. FMPS was 10.5 +/- 6.8% and FMBS 7.7 +/- 6.4%. A significant PAL loss was observed in both sites (1.2 +/- 1.4 mm GTR, 1.3 +/- 1.3 mm RPL, p < 0.0001) between 1 and 5 years. Differences in PAL loss between GTR and RPL sites were not statistically significant. Only a minority of sites (34%), however, lost PAL, while 66% remained stable. 75% of the matched sites (GTR and RPL) within the same patients were concordant in terms of PAL stability. The 23 patients in which both sites remained stable, had good oral hygiene, complied with the recall system, and did not smoke. The 10 patients in which both sites lost PAL showed deteriorating oral hygiene, did not comply with the recall system, and smoked. PAL loss in the GTR and/or RPL sites was consistently observed in patients (losers) showing PAL loss in other teeth. Losers had, in general, negative subjects characteristics, and showed a higher prevalence of tooth loss. (i) GTR and RPL sites showed comparable susceptibility to periodontal breakdown; (ii) stability of outcomes was consistently associated with good oral hygiene, compliance with a supportive periodontal care program, and no cigarette smoking.