Advances in research on the fragile X syndrome
- 12 June 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
- Vol. 6 (2) , 96-106
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<96::aid-mrdd3>3.0.co;2-h
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder that results from a single gene mutation on the X chromosome. The purpose of this review is to summarize key advances made in understanding the fragile X premutation gene seen in carriers and the full mutation gene seen in persons with the syndrome. DNA testing has replaced cytogenetic testing as the primary method for identification of fragile X, although the efficacy of protein level screening is being explored. The premutation is associated with no effects, although there is evidence of physical effects—primarily premature menopause and mild outward features of the fragile X syndrome–among premutation carriers. There is much controversy regarding premutation effects on psychological development. The few experimental studies carried out to date do not suggest noticeable or significant effects. One challenge in addressing this controversy is the sometimes ambiguous differentiation between premutation and full mutation genes. There is a well‐established yet highly variable phenotype of the full mutation. Research from this decade has helped to address specific aspects of this phenotype, including the early course of its development in males, the influence of home and family environments, the nature of social difficulties and autistic features seen in boys and girls with fragile X, and the potential role of hyperarousal or hyper‐reactivity. Studies in these areas, and on the role of FMR protein, will contribute towards ongoing advances in our understanding of fragile X syndrome and its mechanisms. The variability in physical, social, and cognitive features, as described in this review, is one that prohibits clear‐cut screening guidelines designed to avoid high rates of both false positives and false negatives. Results from recent studies indicate the need to consider behavioral features in selecting candidates for fragile X screening. MRDD Research Reviews 2000;6:96‐106.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strong similarities of theFMR1 mutation in multiple tissues: Postmortem studies of a male with a full mutation and a male carrier of a premutationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1999
- Fully mutated and gray-zoneFRAXA alleles in Brazilian mentally retarded boysAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1999
- Screening with the FMR1 protein test among mentally retarded malesHuman Genetics, 1998
- The intermediate alleles of the fragile X CGG repeat in patients with mental retardationClinical Genetics, 1998
- Do mothers of dizygotic twins have earlier menopause? A role for fragile X?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- A de novo deletion in FMR1 in a patient with developmental delayHuman Molecular Genetics, 1994
- Molecular‐neurobehavioral associations in females with the fragile X full mutationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1994
- Trajectory of adaptive behavior in males with fragile X syndromeJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1993
- Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: Resolution of the Sherman paradoxCell, 1991
- Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndromePublished by Elsevier ,1991