Second‐Guessing the Jury: Stereotypic and Hindsight Biases in Perceptions of Court Cases1
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 20 (13) , 1112-1121
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00394.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Perceptions of Blue-Collar and White-Collar Crime: The Effect of Defendant Race on Simulated Juror DecisionsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
- Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: An individual difference analysisJournal of Personality, 1983
- The knew-it-all-along effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978
- The knew-it-all-along effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978
- On the psychology of experimental surprises.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975