The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Top Cited Papers
- 11 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 203 (2) , 115.e1-115.e7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudesContraception, 2009
- Attitudes of women in Scotland to contraception: a qualitative study to explore the acceptability of long-acting methodsBMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2008
- Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesContraception, 2008
- Factors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008
- Challenges in Translating Evidence to PracticeObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- A randomized trial of the intrauterine contraceptive device vs hormonal contraception in women who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Initiation of Oral Contraceptives Using a Quick Start Compared With a Conventional StartObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006
- Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practicePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- U.S. Women's Perceptions of and Attitudes About the IUDObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1996