The Delisting Bias in CRSP's Nasdaq Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect
- 17 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 54 (6) , 2361-2379
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00192
Abstract
We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of −55 percent for missing performance‐related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk‐based explanations of the size effect.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Risk of Bankruptcy a Systematic Risk?The Journal of Finance, 1998
- A Critique of Size-Related AnomaliesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1995
- Size and Book‐to‐Market Factors in Earnings and ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Beta and ReturnThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 1993
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing ModelsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1990
- Firm Size and Turn‐of‐the‐Year Effects in the OTC/NASDAQ MarketThe Journal of Finance, 1989
- Biases in computed returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- The relationship between return and market value of common stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 1981