Retrospective evaluation of a medical curriculum by final-year students
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Medical Teacher
- Vol. 18 (4) , 288-293
- https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599609034179
Abstract
Medical students were asked in a questionnaire to evaluate the importance of all their courses and lectures with respect to their relevance to training to become a doctor. This survey was carried out at the end of the undergraduate curriculum. As the response rate was over 90% (n = 323) the data are undoubtedly representative. There was wide variation in how relevant the students graded the preclinical and clinical courses to be. Some interesting aspects were the differences found between female and male students as well as the correlation with the subject the students planned to specialize in. About 50% of the students had spent at least one month of their clinical clerkships abroad, 20% spent at least four months in the final intensive year in another county and 6% a whole academic year abroad. Retrospective surveys provide important additional information to surveys held at the end of the individual courses.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overseas electivesThe Lancet, 1993
- The overseas elective: purpose or picnic?The Lancet, 1993
- An evaluation of early patient contact for medical studentsMedical Education, 1993
- Problem-based learningAcademic Medicine, 1993
- Experiences with a method for obtaining feedback on a medical curriculum undergoing changeMedical Education, 1993
- All change?The Lancet, 1991
- Improving the curriculum through continuous evaluationAcademic Medicine, 1991
- The New Mexico experimentAcademic Medicine, 1989
- The curriculum: overloaded and too general?Medical Education, 1987
- Medical-School Education, 1975–1979New England Journal of Medicine, 1980