Health visitors’ perception of their role in the universal childhood immunisation programme and their communication strategies with parents
- 3 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Primary Health Care Research & Development
- Vol. 11 (01) , 51-60
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423609990284
Abstract
AimThis study explored health visitors’ perception of their role in the universal childhood immunisation programme with particular emphasis on influencing factors and communication strategies.BackgroundThe majority of parents’ consent to immunisation, but some find decision-making in this area difficult and have unmet information needs. In the United Kingdom, health visitors routinely provide immunisation information for parents, whereas general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses tend to administer vaccines and respond to parents/carers’ questions. Research has investigated health professionals’ views and knowledge about immunisation, but less is understood about health visitors’ role and how they communicate with parents.MethodFollowing the Local Research Ethics and Research Governance permissions, all health visitors (n = 120) working in one county in the United Kingdom were invited to participate in the study. Semistructured interviews (n = 22) were undertaken using a prompt guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using an iterative approach was used to explore the data facilitated by NVIVO™ software.FindingsFive themes emerged from the interviews. These were health visitors’ professional role; identity and perceived barriers and communication strategies, parents’ right to choose, confidence in measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination and communicating with migrant families about immunisation. There were differences between the health visitors in their perceptions of their roles, skills and knowledge and communication strategies. Health visitors perceived that GPs and practice nurses took a paternalistic approach to the provision of immunisation information, while they used a parental decision-making model. Health visitors reported a loss of professional confidence following the MMR crisis.ConclusionGiven the evidence that some parents find it difficult to gain the information they need about immunisation and health visitors’ acknowledgement that their usual communication models were not effective during the MMR crisis, we feel specific communication skills training is needed to enable health professionals to provide parents with appropriate decision support.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisionsHealth Expectations, 2008
- Tracking mothers’ attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996–2006Vaccine, 2007
- Differences in risk factors for partial and no immunisation in the first year of life: prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2006
- ‘Between the demands of truth and government’: Health practitioners, trust and immunisation workSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Tracking mothers attitudes to childhood immunisation 1991–2001Vaccine, 2005
- A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authorityVaccine, 2005
- Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live?Pediatrics, 2004
- Maternal attitudes to preschool immunisations among ethnic minority groupsHealth Education Journal, 2002
- Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication in Private Practice Office Settings: A National SurveyPediatrics, 2001
- RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in childrenThe Lancet, 1998