Events per person year--a dubious concept
- 18 February 1995
- Vol. 310 (6977) , 454-456
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6977.454
Abstract
In 1982 a new measure was introduced in research into osteoporosis and is now used everywhere in the literature. The so called "fracture rate" relates the number of fractures (single in some patients, multiple in others) to the cumulative time of observation of all patients. This concept, however, has no sound basis. Counting events instead of patients usually violates basic statistical assumptions and invalidates the use of common statistical tests and estimators. Its clinical interpretation is rather dubious. The use of such a measure impedes the search for valid and clinically meaningful outcome criteria and should be abandoned.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Fracture thresholds in osteoporosis: implications for hormone replacement treatment.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1992
- T-Cell Receptors in Ataxia–TelangiectasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Intermittent Cyclical Etidronate Treatment of Postmenopausal OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effect of Intermittent Cyclical Etidronate Therapy on Bone Mass and Fracture Rate in Women with Postmenopausal OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effect of Fluoride Treatment on the Fracture Rate in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effect of calcitonin and vitamin D in osteoporosisCalcified Tissue International, 1989
- Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritisControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Effect of the Fluoride/Calcium Regimen on Vertebral Fracture Occurrence in Postmenopausal OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976