Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: Conceptual and statistical differences
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 23 (5) , 415-420
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200010)23:5<415::aid-nur8>3.0.co;2-h
Abstract
Mediators and moderators are variables that affect the association between an independent variable and an outcome variable. Mediators provide additional information about how or why two variables are strongly associated. In contrast, moderators explain the circumstances that cause a weak or ambiguous association between two variables that were expected to have a strong relationship. Mediators and moderators are often overlooked in research designs, or the terms are used incorrectly. This article summarizes the conceptual differences between mediators and moderators. The statistical analysis of moderators and mediators in multiple regression is briefly described and two examples are presented. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 23:415–420, 2000.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imaging ability and effective use of guided imageryResearch in Nursing & Health, 1998
- Mothers' Potential for Child Abuse: The Roles of Childhood Abuse and Social ResourcesNursing Research, 1998
- Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997
- Development of a functional capacity model for the elderlyResearch in Nursing & Health, 1996
- The moderating effect of demographic variables on coping effectivenessJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1995
- Social Support and Well-Being In AdolescentsNursing Research, 1994
- The stress process in family caregivers of persons receiving chemotherapyResearch in Nursing & Health, 1993
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986