Do Industrial Cities have the Highest Rates of Urban Unemployment?
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Urban Policy and Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 24-32
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08111149208551481
Abstract
This paper considers the widely held, but still untested, assumption that deindustrialised and deindustrialising cities have the highest rates of urban unemployment today. Comparison is made between the unemployment rates for the largest Australian cities devoted significantly to manufacturing – Geelong, Newcastle, and Wollongong – and the rates for the other nine major Australian cities. What is found is that the industrial cities did not have the highest rates of unemployment at any of the four censuses under examination(1971, 1976, 1981, 1986). The highest rates were in tourist cities, centres antithetical to industrial cities because they exist for consumption rather than for production (as is the case with the industrial cities).Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tourism UrbanizationInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1991
- TOURIST CITIES AS NEW CITIESAustralian Planner, 1990
- Manufacturing recession? BHP and the recession in WollongongInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1990
- Employment Loss in a Steel City — did we get it Wrong?Urban Policy and Research, 1987
- The regional impact of de-industrialization in the European CommunityRegional Studies, 1986
- Communities in CrisisUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1985
- Employment and income loss in a Steel CityUrban Policy and Research, 1983
- Restructuring steel: the crises of labour and locality in BritainInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1983