Field Experiments
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Literature
- Vol. 42 (4) , 1009-1055
- https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051043004577
Abstract
Experimental economists are leaving the reservation. They are recruiting subjects in the field rather than in the classroom, using field goods rather than induced valuations, and using field context rather than abstract terminology in instructions. We argue that there is something methodologically fundamental behind this trend. Field experiments differ from laboratory experiments in many ways. Although it is tempting to view field experiments as simply less controlled variants of laboratory experiments, we argue that to do so would be to seriously mischaracterize them. What passes for “control” in laboratory experiments might in fact be precisely the opposite if it is artificial to the subject or context of the task. We propose six factors that can be used to determine the field context of an experiment: the nature of the subject pool, the nature of the information that the subjects bring to the task, the nature of the commodity, the nature of the task or trading rules applied, the nature of the stakes, and the environment that subjects operate in.Keywords
This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- Precautionary Saving and Social Learning Across Generations: an ExperimentThe Economic Journal, 2003
- Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomicsPortuguese Economic Journal, 2002
- Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian AmazonAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Experiments in economics: should we trust the dismal scientists in white coats?Journal of Economic Methodology, 1999
- Testing Different Stochastic Specificationsof Risky ChoiceEconomica, 1998
- Trust, Reciprocity, and Social HistoryGames and Economic Behavior, 1995
- The Sensitivity Analysis of Applied General Equilibrium Models: Completely Randomized Factorial Sampling DesignsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1992
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Experiments in the laboratory and the real worldOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973