Sperm Density Measurement: Should this be Abandoned?
- 21 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 64 (5) , 521-523
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05291.x
Abstract
Sperm density measurement by means of the Makler chamber was performed on a single semen specimen from 2 groups: 104 proven fertile men and 53 infertile men; 11.5% of the fertile population had a sperm density < 20 million/ml (median 84, mean 91.3, SD 60.5) and 33% of the infertile population had a sperm density > 20 million/ml (median 10, mean 26.9, SD 34.8). There was a statistically significant difference in median between the 2 groups, but when a discriminant analysis was applied, sperm density could predict fertile status with only 68% accuracy at optimum cut-off. Sperm density is valueless in distinguishing fertile from infertile men and is neither useful in diagnosis nor in monitoring the progress of treatment for male infertility. It should be abandoned as a quotable measurement of male fertility.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- DNA Content of Human Semen-an Objective Measurement of Sperm DensityBritish Journal of Urology, 1985
- Errors Inherent in the Performance of a Routine Semen AnalysisBritish Journal of Urology, 1983
- Annual Patterns of Human Sperm Production and Semen QualityArchives of Andrology, 1983
- Sperm Counts in Fertile and Infertile MenFertility and Sterility, 1979
- Male Fertility Potential in Terms of Semen Quality: A Review of the Past a Study of the PresentFertility and Sterility, 1979
- Semen Analysis: Evidence for Changing Parameters of Male Fertility PotentialFertility and Sterility, 1974
- The Male Factor in Fertility and Infertility. II. Spermatozoön Counts in 1000 Men of Known Fertility and in 1000 Cases of Infertile MarriageJournal of Urology, 1951
- The Spermatozoa CountNew England Journal of Medicine, 1929