Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Vol. 11 (1) , 8-15
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & BukachCognition, 2007
- No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasksCognition, 2007
- The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identificationNature Neuroscience, 2004
- Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processingNature Neuroscience, 2003
- Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face RecognitionVision Research, 1997
- The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face PerceptionJournal of Neuroscience, 1997
- Parts and Wholes in Face RecognitionThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1993
- Configurational Information in Face PerceptionPerception, 1987
- Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1986
- Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969