Implementing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 46 (9) , S74-S83
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e31817fdf68
Abstract
The population served by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) has lower levels of cancer screening compared with the general population and suffers a disproportionate cancer burden. To address these disparities, 3 federal agencies and a primary care association established and tested the feasibility of a Regional Cancer Collaborative (RCC) in 2005. RCC faculty implemented a learning model to improve cancer screening across 4 FQHCs that met explicit organizational readiness criteria. Regional faculty trained "care process leaders," who worked with primary care teams to plan and implement practice changes. FQHCs monitored progress across the following measures of screening implementation: self-management goal-setting; number and percent screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer; percent timely results notification; and percent abnormal screens evaluated within 90 days. Progress and plans were reviewed in regular teleconferences. FQHCs were encouraged to create local communities of practice (LCOP) involving community resources to support cancer screening and to participate in a monthly teleconference that linked the LCOPs into a regional community of practice. Summary reports and administrative data facilitated a process evaluation of the RCC. chi test and test of trends compared baseline and follow-up screening rates. The RCC taught the collaborative process using process leader training, teleconferences, 2 regional meetings, and local process improvement efforts. All organizations created clinical tracking capabilities and 3 of the 4 established LCOPs, which met monthly in an regional community of practice. Screening documentation increased for all 3 cancers from 2005 to 2007. Colorectal cancer screening increased from 8.6% to 21.2%. A regional plan to enable collaborative learning for cancer screening implementation is feasible, and improvements in screening rates can occur among carefully selected organizations.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Management of Chronic Disease at Community Health CentersNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?New England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer TreatmentJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Cervical Cancer in Women With Comprehensive Health Care Access: Attributable Factors in the Screening ProcessJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Assessing the Implementation of the Chronic Care Model in Quality Improvement CollaborativesHealth Services Research, 2005
- Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Improving Diabetes Care in Midwest Community Health Centers With the Health Disparities CollaborativeDiabetes Care, 2004
- Progress in cancer screening practices in the United StatesCancer, 2003
- American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia and CancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002