Response Selection Errors in Spatial Choice Reaction Tasks
- 1 August 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 29 (3) , 415-423
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747708400618
Abstract
In a “Consistent” spatial choice reaction task, the same spatial relationship obtains between each stimulus and its appropriate response. In an “Inconsistent” task this is not so. The present experiment concerns errors in Inconsistent tasks. Duncan (in press) has suggested that, when two spatial S-R relationships are involved in a task, the dominant type of error is a response bearing to the stimulus the wrong one of the two relationships. Duncan's results, however, may be described by a different generalization. Rabbitt and Vyas (1973) have suggested that confusions occur between responses which, when made correctly, bear similar spatial relationships to their stimuli. In the present experiment, a new Inconsistent task is studied. The results support the account of Duncan (in press) but provide no support for that of Rabbitt and Vyas (1973). Partly on the basis of error results, Duncan (in press) proposed a model of response selection in the spatial choice reaction task. Unlike previous accounts, this model is not based on a set of individual “S–-R” associations; operations generating sets of S–-R pairs are involved.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Locus of the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Analysis of Sequential Effects for a Four-Choice Reaction Time ExperimentThe Journal of Psychology, 1971
- Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- RESPONSE‐FACILITATION ON REPETITION OF A LIMB MOVEMENTBritish Journal of Psychology, 1965
- Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding TaskQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961
- On the Rate of Gain of InformationQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952