Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Vol. 13 (3) , 398-406
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00149831-200606000-00016
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is increasingly being assessed as an outcome parameter, especially in chronic diseases such as coronary artery disease (CAD), in which the goal of treatment is not only to prolong life but also to relieve symptoms and improve function. This study was carried out as a non-randomized prospective multicentre study. Patients (N = 432) with CAD were assessed at baseline, 1 and 3 months after treatment assignment [medication, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. HRQL was assessed using the MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacNew) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Routine clinical data including disease severity were collected. The short and intermediate-term results revealed HRQL differences between PCI and CABG in the month immediately after intervention despite the almost identical reduction in angina severity over the first month in both groups. PCI was associated with a relatively rapid increase in HRQL in the first month, with little further change by 3 months. In contrast, after CABG there was an initial deterioration in HRQL, which then improved significantly. The change in depression and anxiety score uniquely accounted for most of the change in the SF-36 (6%, 64%) and MacNew scales (4%, 69%), whereas treatment accounted for less than 1% in any HRQL scale score changes. There appears to be evidence suggesting that HRQL changes after treatments in patients with CAD may be more strongly influenced by mood disturbance than by treatment methods.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease promotes health-related quality of life: results from the FRISC II trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Health related quality of life after conservative or invasive treatment of inducible postinfarction ischaemiaHeart, 2000
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2000
- Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 1-year follow-up in the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization investigation (CABRI) trial.Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1999
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Versus Medical Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris: Outcomes for Patients With Double-Vessel Versus Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease in a Veterans Affairs Cooperative Randomized TrialPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Management of Chronic Stable Angina: Medical Therapy, Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Lessons from the Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- A Comparison of Quality of Life Scores in Patients With Angina Pectoris After Angioplasty Compared With After Medical TherapyCirculation, 1995
- Ten-year follow-up of quality of life in patients randomized to receive medical therapy or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS)Circulation, 1990