Early Hominids--Diversity or Distortion?
- 28 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 299 (5615) , 1994-1997
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078294
Abstract
Recent years have seen the discovery of numerous new hominid species, and the hominid evolutionary tree is now commonly drawn as a complex bush. In his Perspective, White raises a cautionary note, arguing that some fossils may be so distorted that assignment to a new species is premature. Furthermore, natural variation among species must be taken into consideration. The author concludes that it is too early to say whether many more hominid lineages are waiting to be found and recognized in Africa, or whether just a few hominid species expanded their ranges and invaded new habitats.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central AfricaNature, 2002
- Hominid revelations from ChadNature, 2002
- New hominin genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineagesNature, 2001
- Anterior sphenoid in modern humansNature, 1999
- Sphenoid shortening and the evolution of modern human cranial shapeNature, 1998
- New Middle Pleistocene hominid crania from Yunxian in ChinaNature, 1992
- Eukaryotic initiation ritesNature, 1992
- TAXONOMIC CATEGORIES IN FOSSIL HOMINIDSCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1950