THE IMPACT OF BAD WRITING IN ECONOMICS
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 30 (4) , 673-688
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01289.x
Abstract
We find significant style differences between articles written by economists for their professional journals and articles by the same economists in the Wall Street Journal. We find no evidence that style influences the professional success of economists, which suggests that the private rewards to improving the quality of writing are low. Indeed, each community of scholars has probably adopted a “professionally correct” writing style, from which its members diverge little. However, scholars do alter their rhetorical style to communicate effectively with audiences other than the professional community. This suggests that intra‐ and inter‐group (written) communication by economists is efficient.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Making of an EconomistJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1987
- THE COSTS OF ECONOMICAL WRITINGEconomic Inquiry, 1987
- On the Efficient Use of Mathematics in Economics: Some Theory, Facts and Results of an Opinion SurveyKyklos, 1986
- ARTICLE POPULARITYEconomic Inquiry, 1986
- The Rise and (Recent) Decline of Mathematical EconomicsJournal of the History of Economic Thought, 1986
- ECONOMICAL WRITINGEconomic Inquiry, 1985
- Writing and Reading in EconomicsJournal of Political Economy, 1969