The Truth about Social Construction in Administrative Science
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management Inquiry
- Vol. 12 (3) , 273-284
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603257724
Abstract
A great deal of confusion exists about social construction and what it means for administrative and organizational scientists. Eighteen years ago, W. Graham Astley (1985) argued that administrative science is a subjective social artifact rather than a body of objective scientific truths. With the help of contemporary works of John Searle, Alvin Goldman, and Ian Hacking, we distinguish what is correct from what is mistaken in Astley's and other similar social construction theses. In particular, we argue that just because administrative theories are socially constructed and subject to continued structuration, it does not follow that they are precluded from speaking correctly about the world of objects and events. That is, the fact that organization theory is socially constructed is compatible with its truth and objectivity.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowledge in a Social WorldPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1999
- Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational ResearchOrganization Science, 1991
- Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory BuildingAcademy of Management Review, 1990
- Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization TheoriesAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- Laboratory LifePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1987
- Administrative Science as Socially Constructed TruthAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1985
- The Structuring of Organizational StructuresAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- A theory of human motivation.Psychological Review, 1943
- A Treatise of Human NaturePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1739