THE ROLE OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT IN STUDENT GRADING
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Vol. 14 (1) , 20-30
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293890140103
Abstract
While the educational benefits of student self‐assessment are being increasingly recognised and self‐assessment procedures introduced into post‐secondary courses of many different kinds, the use of self‐assessment for grading purposes is a more controversial matter. Is there a role for student self‐assessment in formal assessment proceedings? If there is to be a role, what should it be? This paper focuses on these questions and examines why a marking role for self‐assessment should be considered and what evidence is available on the reliability of student‐generated marks. The implications of these findings are considered and strategies are proposed to improve student markers reliability and to incorporate self‐assessment indirectly into the formal assessment process.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: A research noteHigher Education, 1982
- Contract Grading in the ClassroomImproving College and University Teaching, 1979
- Student Attitudes toward the Grade ContractImproving College and University Teaching, 1978
- Expectancy Theory and Contract Grading Combined as an Effective Motivational Force for College StudentsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1977
- A STUDENT EDUCATIONAL SELF‐EVALUATION TOOLThe Humanist Educator, 1976
- Student Reactions to College Grade ContractsThe Educational Forum, 1972
- Having Students Do the GradingImproving College and University Teaching, 1971
- The Effect of Grade Contracts on Student PerformanceThe Journal of Educational Research, 1971
- Student Reaction to the Grade ContractThe Journal of Educational Research, 1971
- The College Grade ContractThe Educational Forum, 1968