Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study
- 26 August 2004
- Vol. 329 (7464) , 477
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7464.477
Abstract
Objectives To examine how lifestyle, hormonal, and other factors influence the sensitivity and specificity of mammography. Methods Women recruited into the Million Women Study completed a questionnaire about various personal factors before routine mammographic screening. A sample of 122 355 women aged 50-64 years were followed for outcome of screening and incident breast cancer in the next 12 months. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using standard definitions, with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Results Breast cancer was diagnosed in 726 (0.6%) women, 629 in screen positive and 97 in screen negative women; 3885 (3.2%) were screen positive but had no subsequent diagnosis of breast cancer. Overall sensitivity was 86.6% and specificity was 96.8%. Three factors had an adverse effect on both measures: use of hormone replacement therapy (sensitivity: 83.0% (95% confidence interval 77.4% to 87.6%), 84.7% (73.9% to 91.6%), and 92.1% (87.6% to 95.0%); specificity: 96.8% (96.6% to 97.0%), 97.8% (97.5% to 98.0%), and 98.1% (98.0% to 98.2%), respectively, for current, past, and never use); previous breast surgery v no previous breast surgery (sensitivity: 83.5% (75.7% to 89.1%) v 89.4% (86.5% to 91.8%); specificity: 96.2% (95.8% to 96.5%) v 97.4% (97.3% to 97.5%), respectively); and body mass index < 25 v ≥ 25 (sensitivity: 85.7% (81.2% to 89.3%) v 91.0% (87.5% to 93.6%); specificity: 97.2% (97.0% to 97.3%) v 97.4% (97.3% to 97.6%), respectively). Neither sensitivity nor specificity varied significantly according to age, family history of breast cancer, parity, past oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, physical activity, smoking, or alcohol consumption. Conclusions The efficiency, and possibly the effectiveness, of mammographic screening is lower in users of hormone replacement therapy, in women with previous breast surgery, and in thin women compared with other women.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of use of hormone replacement therapy on false positive recall in the NHS breast screening programme: results from the million women studyBMJ, 2004
- Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service Breast Screening ProgrammeJournal of Medical Screening, 2002
- Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: a reviewJournal of Medical Screening, 2001
- Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected CancersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Breast Tumor Characteristics as Predictors of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected CancersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Effects of Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin on Mammographic Parenchymal DensityAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programmeJournal of Medical Screening, 1998
- Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.Radiology, 1998
- Case-Control Study of Factors Associated With Failure to Detect Breast Cancer by MammographyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- Relationship of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns with Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer in a Prospective StudyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1990