Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia
- 26 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 25 (5) , 1466-1471
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1415-1
Abstract
There is scarce evidence regarding optimal treatment options for achalasia in patients with varying illness severity risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare outcomes with laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication (LM) and esophageal dilation (ED) for hospitalized patients with different illness severity. The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) is an alliance of more than 100 academic medical centers and nearly 200 affiliate hospitals. UHC’s Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager (CDB/RM) allows member hospitals to compare patient-level risk-adjusted outcomes for performance improvement purposes. The CDB/RM was queried for patients with achalasia who underwent LM (n = 1,390) or ED (n = 492) during a 3-year period between 2006 and 2008. Overall esophageal perforation rates were significantly higher for ED (0.4% LM vs. 2.4% ED; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing LM with minor/moderate illness severity showed higher morbidity (9.42% LM vs. 5.15% ED; p < 0.05). However, LM patients in this illness severity group showed significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (0.38% LM vs. 7.32% ED; p < 0.001) and length of stay (2.23 ± 1.78 LM vs. 4.88 ± 4.42 days ED; p < 0.001), but comparable cost ($9,539 LM vs. $8990 ED; p > 0.05). In the major/extreme illness severity group mortality was comparable (1.37% LM vs. 2.44% ED; p > 0.05). Overall morbidity was significantly greater in LM (50.48% LM vs. 19.57% ED; p < 0.001). However, the length of stay was significantly increased in the ED group (8.96 ± 7.86 LM vs. 11.72 ± 11.05 days ED; p = 0.04). In hospitalized patients with minor/moderate illness severity, laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia showed comparable or better outcomes than ED. For major/extreme illness severity, dilation showed comparable or better profile for hospitalized achalasia patients. These results highlight the importance and impact of illness severity on outcomes of achalasia patients.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: results after 10 yearsSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Preoperative Dilatation Does Not Affect the Surgical Outcome of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication for Esophageal AchalasiaSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2009
- Current clinical approach to achalasiaWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Achalasia of the Esophagus: A Surgical DiseaseJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2009
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Plus Dor Fundoplication Versus Nissen Fundoplication for AchalasiaAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Long-term outcomes confirm the superior efficacy of extended Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication for achalasiaSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Very Late Results of Esophagomyotomy for Patients With AchalasiaAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Poor outcomes in cirrhosis-associated hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study of 32,033 patientsHernia, 2005
- Short-Term and Long-Term Results of Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Achalasia: 12 Years’ ExperienceEndoscopy, 2004
- Comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic heller myotomy for achalasiaJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998