Pacemaker Clinic Evaluations: Key to Early Identification of Surgical Problems
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 9 (6) , 1259-1264
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb06705.x
Abstract
The pacemaker center evaluation was responsible for the timely reoperation of 341 pacemaker patients over the last three years. The most common indication for reoperation was battery end‐of‐service (46.3%). Battery testing and maintenance of accurate records for trend analysis ensures prompt generator replacement. Atrial and/or ventricular lead malfunction was the second largest indication (26.3%). Lead malfunction detected by bracketing capture and sensing thresholds included: dislodgement, penetration, exit block, fracture, insulation failure, and abnormal sensing. The third largest indication for reoperation was pacemaker pocket erosion and/or infection (15.5%). Examination of the pacemaker pocket site is an integral part of an evaluation. In conclusion, the three largest indications for reoperations can he best demonstrated in a pacemaker center where evaluations are personal and thorough, and accurate record keeping is maintained.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation of Dual Chamber Pacemaker ElectrocardiogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- Follow‐Up of DDD PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Clinical Benefits of Telemetered Electrograms in Assessment of DDD FunctionPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Programmability in DDD PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Clinical Problems in Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited Pacing: A Long-term Follow-up of 54 PatientsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Comprehensive Cardiac Pacemaker Information System: Basis for a Regional Follow‐up NetworkPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1978