Recognition of ???Real-World??? Musical Excerpts by Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Adults
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 26 (3) , 237-250
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200506000-00001
Abstract
The purposes of this study were (a) to compare recognition of "real-world" music excerpts by postlingually deafened adults using cochlear implants and normal-hearing adults; (b) to compare the performance of cochlear implant recipients using different devices and processing strategies; and (c) to examine the variability among implant recipients in recognition of musical selections in relation to performance on speech perception tests, performance on cognitive tests, and demographic variables. Seventy-nine cochlear implant users and 30 normal-hearing adults were tested on open-set recognition of systematically selected excerpts from musical recordings heard in real life. The recognition accuracy of the two groups was compared for three musical genre: classical, country, and pop. Recognition accuracy was correlated with speech recognition scores, cognitive measures, and demographic measures, including musical background. Cochlear implant recipients were significantly less accurate in recognition of previously familiar (known before hearing loss) musical excerpts than normal-hearing adults (p < 0.001) for all three genre. Implant recipients were most accurate in the recognition of country items and least accurate in the recognition of classical items. There were no significant differences among implant recipients due to implant type (Nucleus, Clarion, or Ineraid), or programming strategy (SPEAK, CIS, or ACE). For cochlear implant recipients, correlations between melody recognition and other measures were moderate to weak in strength; those with statistically significant correlations included age at time of testing (negatively correlated), performance on selected speech perception tests, and the amount of focused music listening following implantation. Current-day cochlear implants are not effective in transmitting several key structural features (i.e., pitch, harmony, timbral blends) of music essential to open-set recognition of well-known musical selections. Consequently, implant recipients must rely on extracting those musical features most accessible through the implant, such as song lyrics or a characteristic rhythm pattern, to identify the sorts of musical selections heard in everyday life.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Familiarity and Complexity on Appraisal of Complex Songs by Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal Hearing AdultsJournal of Music Therapy, 2003
- Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adultsCochlear Implants International, 2002
- Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Musical Perception of Cochlear Implant Users as Measured by the Primary Measures of Music Audiation: An Item AnalysisJournal of Music Therapy, 1992
- Psychological Predictors of Audiological Outcomes of Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Preliminary FindingsAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1991
- Melodic, Rhythmic, and Timbral Perception of Adult Cochlear Implant UsersJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1991
- Pitch Scaling and Speech Understanding by Patients Who Use the Ineraid Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 1990
- An Interactive Theory of Music PreferenceJournal of Music Therapy, 1982
- Popular Music Preferences of Elderly PeopleJournal of Music Therapy, 1977
- Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns.Psychological Review, 1963