A patient preference study comparing raltitrexed (‘Tomudex’) and bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil regimens in advanced colorectal cancer: influence of side-effects and administration attributes
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Cancer Care
- Vol. 8 (3) , 154-161
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00152.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor–patient relationshipJournal of Health Economics, 1998
- Assessing patients' needs and preferences in the management of advanced colorectal cancer.British Journal of Cancer, 1998
- RaltitrexedDrugs, 1998
- Final results of a randomised trial comparing ‘Tomudex’® (raltitrexed) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- Tradeoffs between Quality and Quantity of LifeMedical Decision Making, 1996
- Cancer patients, doctors and nurses vary in their willingness to undertake cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Breast Cancer Patients' Perceived Participation in Health Care: How Do Patients Themselves and Nurses Assess this Participation?Nursing Ethics, 1994
- Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.BMJ, 1990
- High-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil bolus and continuous infusion in advanced colorectal cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Considerations guiding physicians when informing cancer patientsSocial Science & Medicine, 1987