A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Vol. 123 (1) , 36-43
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014040
Abstract
Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to acquisition, but it did not affect the respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC007997)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR014166)
- National Science Foundation (Agreement No. 0112050)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms of odor discrimination: neurophysiological and behavioral approachesTrends in Neurosciences, 2005
- Odour concentration affects odour identity in honeybeesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Maintaining Accuracy at the Expense of SpeedNeuron, 2004
- Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera)Chemical Senses, 2004
- Odor similarity does not influence the time needed for odor processing.Chemical Senses, 2003
- Intensity versus Identity Coding in an Olfactory SystemNeuron, 2003
- Olfactory learning modifies the expression of odour‐induced oscillatory responses in the gamma (60–90 Hz) and beta (15–40 Hz) bands in the rat olfactory bulbEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2003
- Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentrationJournal of Comparative Neurology, 2000
- Peripheral Odor Coding in the Rat and Frog: Quality and Intensity SpecificationJournal of Neuroscience, 2000