No Gold Standard Estimation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Molecular Diagnostic Protocols for Trypanosoma brucei spp. in Western Kenya
Open Access
- 7 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (1) , e8628
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008628
Abstract
African animal trypanosomiasis is caused by a range of tsetse transmitted protozoan parasites includingTrypanosoma vivax, Trypanosoma congolense and Trypansoma brucei. In Western Kenya and other parts of East Africa two subspecies of T. brucei, T.b. brucei and the zoonoticT.b. rhodesiense, co-circulate in livestock. A range of polymerase chain reactions (PCR) have been developed as important molecular diagnostic tools for epidemiological investigations of T. brucei s.l. in the animal reservoir and of its zoonotic potential. Quantification of the relative performance of different diagnostic PCRs is essential to ensure comparability of studies. This paper describes an evaluation of two diagnostic test systems for T. brucei using a T. brucei s.l. specific PCR [1] and a single nested PCR targeting the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions of trypanosome ribosomal DNA [2]. A Bayesian formulation of the Hui-Walter latent class model was employed to estimate their test performance in the absence of a gold standard test for detecting T.brucei s.l. infections in ear-vein blood samples from cattle, pig, sheep and goat populations in Western Kenya, stored on Whatman FTA cards. The results indicate that the system employing the T. brucei s.l. specific PCR (Se1 = 0.760) had a higher sensitivity than the ITS-PCR (Se2 = 0.640); both have high specificity (Sp1 = 0.998; Sp2 = 0.997). The true prevalences for livestock populations were estimated (pcattle = 0.091, ppigs = 0.066, pgoats = 0.005, psheep = 0.006), taking into account the uncertainties in the specificity and sensitivity of the two test systems. Implications of test performance include the required survey sample size; due to its higher sensitivity and specificity, the T. brucei s.l. specific PCR requires a consistently smaller sample size than the ITS-PCR for the detection of T. brucei s.l. However the ITS-PCR is able to simultaneously screen samples for other pathogenic trypanosomes and may thus be, overall, a better choice of test in multi-organism studies.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of a Flow Assay for Brucellosis Antibodies with the Reference cELISA Test in West African Bos indicusPLOS ONE, 2009
- Comparative evaluation of three PCR base diagnostic assays for the detection of pathogenic trypanosomes in cattle bloodParasites & Vectors, 2008
- Trypanosomosis in The Gambia: prevalence in working horses and donkeys detected by whole genome amplification and PCR, and evidence for interactions between trypanosome speciesBMC Veterinary Research, 2008
- Public–private partnership works to stamp out sleeping sickness in UgandaTrends in Parasitology, 2007
- Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standardPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2005
- Pathogenesis of animal trypanosomiasis.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- Diagnosis and epidemiology of African animal trypanosomiasis.Published by CABI Publishing ,2004
- Measuring the costs of African animal trypanosomosis, the potential benefits of control and returns to researchAgricultural Systems, 1999
- Use of a PCR Assay for the Specific and Sensitive Detection of Trypanosoma Spp. in Naturally Infected Dairy Cattle in Peri‐urban Kampala, UgandaaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998
- Detection ofTrypanosoma congolenseandTrypanosoma bruceisubspecies by DNA amplification using the polymerase chain reactionParasitology, 1989