Asymmetric Learning by Doing and Dynamically Efficient Policy: Implications for Domestic and International Emissions Permit Trading of Allocating Permits Usefully
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Energy & Environment
- Vol. 11 (6) , 665-679
- https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305001500473
Abstract
Learning by doing leads to cost reductions as suppliers move down the ‘experience curve’. This results in a beneficial supply side inter-temporal externality that, for dynamic efficiency, requires a higher incentive for abatement innovations than the penalty on emissions. This effect can be achieved by a dedicated emissions tax or by a proportionate abatement obligation or by allocating permits usefully. The latter arrangement is compatible with the effective cap on emissions that is secured by an emissions trading scheme. Each of the three possibilities results in a reduced loss of international competitivity in policy-committed regions, in less ‘leakage’, and in more technology transfer. Implications for trading in emissions permits and in project-related credits are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- An information perspective on dynamic efficiency in environmental policyInformation Economics and Policy, 2000
- Comparative static analysis of proportionate abatement obligations (PAO'Ss ‐ a market‐based instrument for responding to global warmingNew Zealand Economic Papers, 1999
- The Kyoto Mechanisms and the Need for Commercialised Offsets TradingPublished by Springer Nature ,1999
- Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the EconomyPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1994
- The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the EnvironmentThe Swedish Journal of Economics, 1971
- The Economic Implications of Learning by DoingThe Review of Economic Studies, 1962