Reprint: Good Laboratory Practice: Preventing Introduction of Bias at the Bench
Open Access
- 17 September 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Vol. 29 (2) , 221-223
- https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2008.101
Abstract
As a research community, we have failed to show that drugs, which show substantial efficacy in animal models of cerebral ischemia, can also improve outcome in human stroke. Accumulating evidence suggests this may be due, at least in part, to problems in the design, conduct, and reporting of animal experiments which create a systematic bias resulting in the overstatement of neuroprotective efficacy. Here, we set out a series of measures to reduce bias in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments modeling human stroke.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence for the Efficacy of NXY-059 in Experimental Focal Cerebral Ischaemia Is Confounded by Study QualityStroke, 2008
- Empirical Evidence of Bias in the Design of Experimental Stroke StudiesStroke, 2008
- How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke?Trends in Neurosciences, 2007
- Bench to Bedside: The Quest for Quality in Experimental Stroke ResearchJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2006
- 1,026 Experimental treatments in acute strokeAnnals of Neurology, 2006
- Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of the Efficacy of FK506 in Experimental StrokeJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2005
- Sample Size Calculations in Acute Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review of Their Reporting, Characteristics, and Relationship With OutcomeStroke, 2004
- Recommendations for Standards Regarding Preclinical Neuroprotective and Restorative Drug DevelopmentStroke, 1999
- Quality of Full and Final Publications Reporting Acute Stroke TrialsStroke, 1998
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996