Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort
Open Access
- 8 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 170 (12) , 1803-1807
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031315
Abstract
Background: Most Canadian emergency departments use an unstructured, individualized approach to patients with chest pain, without data to support the safety and efficiency of this practice. We sought to determine the proportions of patients with chest discomfort in emergency departments who either had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and were inappropriately discharged from the emergency department or did not have ACS and were held for investigation. Methods: Consecutive consenting patients aged 25 years or older presenting with chest discomfort to 2 urban tertiary care emergency departments between June 2000 and April 2001 were prospectively enrolled unless they had a terminal illness, an obvious traumatic cause, a radiographically identifiable cause, severe communication problems or no fixed address in British Columbia or they would not be available for follow-up by telephone. At 30 days we assigned predefined explicit outcome diagnoses: definite ACS (acute myocardial infarction [AMI] or definite unstable angina) or no ACS. Results: Of 1819 patients, 241 (13.2%) were assigned a 30-day diagnosis of AMI and 157 (8.6%), definite unstable angina. Of these 398 patients, 21 (5.3%) were discharged from the emergency department without a diagnosis of ACS and without plans for further investigation. The clinical sensitivity for detecting ACS was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5%– 96.9%) and the specificity 73.8% (95% CI 71.5%– 76.0%). Of the patients without ACS or an adverse event, 71.1% were admitted to hospital or held in the emergency department for more than 3 hours. Interpretation: The current individualized approach to evaluation and disposition of patients with chest discomfort in 2 Canadian tertiary care emergency departments misses 5.3% of cases of ACS while consuming considerable health care resources for patients without coronary disease. Opportunities exist to improve both safety and efficiency.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized trial of the effects of early cardiac serum marker availability on reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Cost-Effectiveness of Mandatory Stress Testing in Chest Pain Center PatientsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Comprehensive Strategy for the Evaluation and Triage of the Chest Pain PatientAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Cost-effectiveness of a new short-stay unit to “rule out” acute myocardial infarction in low risk patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: Results from a multicenter studyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Outcome of patients who were admitted to a new short-stay unit to “rule-out” myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- A Computer-Derived Protocol to Aid in the Diagnosis of Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982