Systems methodologies as complementary tools for managing situational complexity
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
- Vol. 10 (3) , 155-160
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014233128801000307
Abstract
This paper identifies a certain class of systems methodologies - those which seek to be tools for managing of complexity. This class contains four distinct types of systems approach: hard; cybernetic ; soft; and critical Each of these differs from the others in the way it understands complexity and the way it attempts to alleviate the problems posed by complexity. It is argued, following from this, that different forms of complexity respond to treatment from different systems methodologies. A classification of systems approaches is then constructed on this basis. The classification should help practitioners, since, if they are able to identify the nature of the complexity they face, it will assist in the choice of an appropriate systems methodology for managing that complexity. It should also help systems theorists to recognise the complementary nature of their work and give meaning to the otherwise somewhat empty formula that systems science is a unified endeavour concerned with managing situational complexity.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complexity: A definition by construction of a conceptual frameworkSystems Research, 1987
- SOCIAL SYSTEMS THEORY AND PRACTICE: THE NEED FOR A CRITICAL APPROACHInternational Journal of General Systems, 1985
- Towards a System of Systems MethodologiesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1984
- BEYOND PREDICTION AND PREPARATION [I]Journal of Management Studies, 1983
- An introduction to cyberneticsPublished by Biodiversity Heritage Library ,1956